Mallinder: Irish clash is must-win
April 20, 2011
Jim Mallinder is preparing his side for a huge clash against London Irish © Getty Images
Northampton boss Jim Mallinder had branded Saturday's Aviva Premiership clash against London Irish as a must-win following Tuesday night's loss to Gloucester.
A below-strength Saints side suffered a 27-15 reversal at Kingsholm, leaving them in fourth spot, the final play-off place, four points above London Irish with two games left.
After Saturday's clash with the Exiles, Northampton face relegation candidates Leeds Carnegie, while their rivals are on the road to title-chasing Leicester.
"We need to go down and beat London Irish on Saturday, it's as simple as that," Mallinder said.
The Irish clash will complete a hectic period of three games in nine days for the Saints, with their sizeable England contingent only allowed to play 160 minutes of the fixtures.
England forwards Dylan Hartley and Courtney Lawes appeared as second-half substitutes against Gloucester in a game rearranged following a Boxing Day postponement due to freezing weather.
"We should not be playing these midweek fixtures. We need to get adequate covers to play week after week," Mallinder said. "We made a good comeback and it was disappointing we did not get a bonus point, but we conceded two sloppy tries.
"Dylan Hartley and Soane Tonga'uiha both went close to tries, and we had some overlaps when we could possibly have done better, but it is still in our hands."
© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.
Last year's thrashing at the hands of Wales was not the first time England have fallen to their rivals. Scrum Sevens looks at whether they have bounced back the following year
With just two rounds left in the 2014 championship, the intensity cranks up a notch at Twickenham. Tom Hamilton previews the weekend's action
"I had a perfect record against England as did a few other Welshmen. England always seemed to bring the best out of us." John Taylor on the age-old rivalry
Are the margins between the teams in the Six Nations getting smaller year-on-year? Huw Richards gives some answers