Parisse: Italy not scared of Chabal
March 11, 2011
Sebastien Chabal was unable to make an impact against England © Getty Images
Italy skipper Sergio Parisse has no fears about facing Sebastien Chabal on Saturday, insisting that France would pose a bigger threat with Imanol Harinordoquy at the base of the scrum.
Chabal has controversially retained his place in the starting line-up after a below-par performance against England at Twickenham two weeks ago, with his rival relegated to the bench following the recall of Julien Bonnaire at openside.
Parisse will pack down alongside Alessandro Zanni and Robert Barbieri in an improving loose trio and is confident that they can shackle Chabal.
"They are two completely different players," Parisse told CP. "Harinordoquy is a more complete player than Chabal, who is more of a physical player and who tries to make more of a physical impact than Imanol does.
"I think it is better for us to play against someone like Chabal than Harinordoquy. Like I said, Harinordoquy is a more all-around player. He is important in the lineout and is good with the ball in hand."
Italy boss Nick Mallett has demanded that his side, showing seven changes from the one narrowly beaten by Wales, do not capitulate as they did against England at Twickenham in round two following a positive opening salvo against Ireland.
"I don't want another disastrous weekend like we had after we played well against Ireland," Mallett said. "It is difficult to manage the mental pressure, but we want to play four top-level matches in this competition so as to forget about England."
© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.
The time for tinkering is over - England must nail their colours to the mast in key positions, writes Phil Vickery
"New Zealand-born Joe Schmidt has forged the Irish into a street-smart, well- prepared side," John Mitchell on the Irish renaissance
"I am bored of hearing 'I can't fault the effort'. Let us take that for granted and look for some quality." John Taylor writes
Reports comparing the 2014 Wallabies with their rabble-like predecessors of 2005 are unfair and self-serving, Greg Growden reports